Guides · How to buy

How rep sellers organise stock, and why finding things is hard

Rep catalogues are built for a seller working from WeChat, not for you browsing. What that means for finding an item, and why half of what you see cannot be bought.

Published 2026-08-10

Browsing a rep seller feels broken the first few times. Albums are named things like "A1 (v2)". The same jacket appears three times. Half the albums have no buy link. Items you saw last week are gone, and nothing is where a shop would put it.

None of this is disorganisation. It is a catalogue built for somebody else's job.

The catalogue is a working file, not a storefront

A rep seller's primary interface is a chat window. Somebody messages them, asks for a jacket, and the seller sends photos and a link. The album exists so the seller has something to send — it is closer to a folder on a desktop than to a product page.

Everything odd follows from that. Album names are shorthand the seller understands. Ordering reflects when things were added, not what is popular. Duplicates exist because it was easier to make a new album than to edit an old one. You are reading somebody's filing system over their shoulder.

What an album actually is

One album is usually one product, holding every photo the seller has of it: the item on white, the item worn, close-ups, sometimes a size chart, sometimes the box it ships in.

The buy link, when there is one, lives in the album's caption — a text field, not a button. That is the whole checkout mechanism. Which means:

That gap is large in practice, not theoretical. When we scraped these stores, the proportion of albums carrying a resolvable marketplace link ranged from nearly all of them to about one in twenty-five. One store in our set had none at all across its entire catalogue. If you are browsing and keep hitting albums with nothing to click, that is the store, not you.

Why the first photo is so often not the product

This is the single most useful thing to know about rep catalogues, and it is invisible until somebody points at it.

The photo an album leads with is frequently not a usable photo of the item. When we checked covers across four stores with a vision pass, the first frame was the right frame only about 60% of the time. What sits in front instead:

Each store does this differently, which is why no positional rule works. One store leads with unboxing sequences. Another leads with colourway grids and puts a size chart second. A third leads with factory and raw-material shots. And at least one album we examined contained a photo of an entirely unrelated product — a leather bomber jacket inside an album for denim shorts.

The practical version: scroll past the first frame before you judge an item. The product is usually in there.

Categories exist, and they are approximate

Larger stores group albums into categories — sneakers, bags, apparel, accessories. These help, with caveats. The taxonomy is the seller's, so a "bags" category may hold wallets and belts. Items get filed once and never refiled. And a category that looks empty may just be one the seller stopped using.

Store-level search, where it exists, searches the album titles — the shorthand, not the product. Searching for "hoodie" finds albums somebody happened to name "hoodie".

What this means for you

How this site works around it

Rather than sending you into an album to guess, the shelf holds items that passed both filters that matter: a photo a vision pass confirmed shows the actual product, and a buy link whose item id resolves. That second filter is why the shelf is smaller than the catalogues behind it — plenty of good items are excluded purely because nothing clickable was attached to them.

If you are trying to identify a seller from a photo rather than browse one, finding a seller from a photo covers that. If you are weighing whether to buy from a seller at all, how to evaluate a rep seller is the place to start, and every seller's quoted record is on the sellers index.

Read next

All guides → The sellers → Decode a dead link →